Connect with us

Banking and Finance

Kunle Adedeji’s Stanbic IBTC Holdings Faces 405 Legal Battles, Budgets N260bn For Litigation

Published

on

By Adeyemi Obadimu (VERON)



STANBIC IBTC Holdings PLC is embroiled in a legal storm, with a staggering 405 lawsuits piling up against the financial giant, NEWSEXTRA learnt.



To this end, the company has set aside a colossal N260 billion to deal with its mounting legal troubles, raising serious concerns about its corporate governance and financial stability.



The Group’s litigation portfolio, as of September 30, 2024, includes claims totaling N260,820,169,869.44; USD$ 1,942,819.15 & GB £75,840.71



Despite these overwhelming figures, the bank’s leadership remains adamant that these legal battles will not impact its financial health—a claim that rings hollow given the sheer volume and value of pending cases.



AMCON Dispute Highlights Questionable Dealings

One of the most alarming cases is the ongoing legal clash with the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON). The dispute, which dates back to December 2012, revolves around a questionable transaction where STANBIC IBTC allegedly sold non-performing loans to AMCON at an inflated valuation of N10 billion. AMCON later challenged this valuation, unilaterally revising the figure down to N5.7 billion and accusing the bank of misrepresentation.



When AMCON sought to recover what it claimed was an overpayment, STANBIC IBTC refused, leading to a drawn-out legal battle.



In a shocking turn, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) intervened in July 2019, directly debiting the bank’s account to recover N4 billion. This unprecedented action suggests serious regulatory concerns about STANBIC IBTC’s financial dealings.



While the bank initially lost its case at the Federal High Court, the Appeal Court overturned the decision in 2022, ruling that AMCON had no authority to reverse the sale outside the 12-month window set by its own regulations.



However, AMCON has now escalated the case to the Supreme Court, where a final ruling is expected in 2025. This prolonged legal battle raises significant doubts about the integrity of STANBIC IBTC’s financial transactions and its ability to operate within regulatory frameworks.



A Pattern of Legal Controversy

The AMCON dispute is just one of hundreds of lawsuits against the bank, painting a troubling picture of a financial institution mired in legal uncertainty.



With N260 billion set aside for litigation, it is evident that STANBIC IBTC anticipates more legal woes ahead. According to market observers, he sheer volume of claims suggests a pattern of corporate missteps, raising red flags for investors and stakeholders alike.



Despite the bank’s assurances that these lawsuits will not materially affect its financial position, the market remains skeptical. If the Supreme Court rules against STANBIC IBTC in the AMCON case, analysts believe this could set a precedent for further liabilities, potentially, destabilising the bank’s financial standing.



What Lies Ahead for STANBIC IBTC?

As the company faces increased legal scrutiny, its reputation hangs in the balance. Investors and customers are left questioning whether the bank is truly as stable as it claims, or if it is merely masking deeper financial troubles.



With the Supreme Court set to weigh in on the AMCON case in 2025, STANBIC IBTC’s future remains uncertain.



For now, the bank continues to operate under the cloud of litigation, with hundreds of billions of naira earmarked for legal battles. Whether it emerges unscathed or suffers a financial hit remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: STANBIC IBTC’s legal troubles are far from over.

In the ordinary course of business, the Group is exposed to various actual and potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings that relate to alleged errors, omissions, and breaches. The Directors are satisfied, based on present information and the advice of legal counsel, that no material loss is likely to be incurred by the Group in respect of these claims.

The Group’s litigation portfolio as of 30 September 2024 comprised 405 cases, with a total claim value of monetary claims against the Group was .

While the total claims filed against the Group are substantial, the Directors believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a significant adverse effect on the Group’s financial position or profitability. The Group has made adequate provisions where necessary, and management continues to monitor and review legal risks proactively.

(S)newsextra

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Banking and Finance

Stewardship, Not Seizure: What the Union Bank Case Is Really About

Published

on

By

There is a particular genre of financial commentary that mistakes legal process fora factual verdict. A court delivers a first-instance ruling, procedural questions areraised, and before the ink is dry on the appeal filing, the narrative has alreadyhardened: the regulator overreached, investor confidence is shattered, andNigeria’s financial governance is on trial before the world. Much of thecommentary currently circulating about Union Bank of Nigeria belongs to thatgenre. It is not without merit on certain procedural questions. But it is, at its core,incomplete — and incompleteness in financial journalism carries costs that runwell beyond the column.The Acquisition That Started EverythingIn 2022, Titan Trust Bank Limited, then chaired by Mr Tunde Lemo, acquiredapproximately 94 per cent of Union Bank of Nigeria through two Dubai-registeredentities: Luxis International DMCC, promoted by Mr Rahul Savara, and MrCornelius Vink’s Magna International DMCC, both linked to the Tropical GeneralInvestments (TGI) Group. The US$300 million transaction was financedpredominantly through an Afreximbank facility. The CBN’s policy is unambiguous:borrowed funds may not be used to acquire shares in a licensed financialinstitution. That principle exists because debt-funded acquisitions hollow out thevery capital base they purport to build.That is precisely what happened. A forensic audit found that the Afreximbank loanwas ultimately reflected in Union Bank’s own books, with no hedgingarrangements against naira depreciation. As the currency weakened, revaluationlosses intensified, the capital adequacy ratio deteriorated into negative territory,non-performing loan exposure increased significantly, and a substantial capitalshortfall emerged. Critically, as stated in the Bank’s own Notice of Appeal, aspecial examination was conducted, and its findings were formally presented toformer Managing Director Mudassir Amray and the board then chaired by FaroukGumel, who were confronted with the institution’s grave financial condition andcontinuing regulatory infractions. The claim that the CBN acted without evidencebefore dissolving the board is, on the record, simply not accurate.The Legal PictureThe CBN acted under Section 34 of BOFIA 2020 and Section 52 of the CBN Act2007 — broad discretionary executive powers that do not require a specialexamination as a condition precedent. The Federal High Court’s characterisationof those powers as quasi-judicial is itself among the central questions now onappeal. Both the CBN and Union Bank have filed formal appeals. Union Bank’sown Notice of Appeal, filed the day after judgment on thirteen grounds and arguedby Olaniwun Ajayi LP, challenges the ruling on several fronts: that therespondents may never have had locus standi to sue in the first place, under therule in Foss v. Harbottle; that the application was filed nearly two years after theJanuary 2024 events, well outside the prescribed three-month limitation window;and that the CBN-supervised recapitalisation exercise, mandated under Section 9of BOFIA, cannot constitute evidence of bad faith. These are not technicalities.They are substantive questions of law that the Court of Appeal must nowdetermine. The Human Stakes and the Real QuestionBehind the legal arguments sit approximately 7.8 million depositors and around6,450 employees across 281 branches. Union Bank’s own affidavit describes it as asystemically important institution in a precarious financial situation, continuing torely on CBN forbearance for its existence — a frank admission that validates,rather than undermines, the case for intervention. Meanwhile, critics argue thedispute damages investor confidence. The wider evidence does not support thatconclusion. By April 2026, thirty-three Nigerian banks had raised N4.65 trillionunder the CBN’s recapitalisation framework — over ten times the 2004 to 2005consolidation figure. The Nigerian Exchange All-Share Index rose approximately29 per cent in the first quarter of 2026 alone. The market has read the CBN’sresolve as stability, not recklessness. Conflating this case with a systemicconfidence crisis runs the risk of misleading the very international investors thecommentary claims to be protecting.The structural vulnerability at the centre of this dispute originates not with theregulator but with an acquisition financed with borrowed funds, loaded onto theacquired institution’s balance sheet, and left unhedged against exchange-raterisk. When the CBN stepped in, it was doing what central banks everywhere areexpected to do. When Union Bank’s own legally constituted board subsequentlyfiled its own appeal, it was signalling what a properly constituted governancestructure recognises as being in the institution’s best interests. Nigeria’sappellate courts — not the court of commentary — are the appropriate arena forresolution.Union Bank of Nigeria is a 109-year-old institution serving nearly eight milliondepositors. It is not being dismantled. It is being stabilised under active regulatorysupervision, with operations intact and depositors protected. In the language ofinstitutional governance, that is called stewardship. The commentary thatmistakes it for anything else does the institution, its depositors, and Nigeria’sfinancial governance narrative a disservice that will outlast the headlines.*Bala Rabiu, writes from Kano

Continue Reading

Banking and Finance

Fidelity Bank Extends Food Bank Initiative to Thousands in Surulere

Published

on

By

Photo caption:L-R: Team Lead, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Fidelity Bank Plc, Victoria Abuka; Personal Assistant to the President on Constituency Affairs, Hon. Khadijat Kareem Omotayo; Branch Leader, Adeola Odeku Branch, Fidelity Bank Plc, Ifeyinwa Asomugha; Surulere Local Government Executive, Anthonia Adenike Adjivon; and First Vice Chairman, Community Development Committee (CDC), Surulere Local Government, Adebayo Odukoya; during the Fidelity Food Bank outreach in Surulere, Lagos recently.

Leading financial institution, Fidelity Bank Plc, has reinforced its commitment to community welfare and sustainable development with the distribution of food packs to over 1,500 residents in Surulere, Lagos state.The outreach, executed under the Bank’s Fidelity Food Bank initiative, was carried out in partnership with the Office of the Personal Assistant to the President on Constituency Affairs and the Sodiq Abiodun Ogundare (SAO) Foundation.Speaking during the event, Regional Bank Head, Victoria Island/Lekki, Fidelity Bank Plc, Nnamdi Edekobi, represented by the Branch Leader, Adeola Odeku Branch, Fidelity Bank Plc, Ifeyinwa Asomugha, described the initiative as a reflection of Fidelity Bank’s unwavering dedication to improving the wellbeing of its host communities.“Today goes beyond the distribution of food items; it is about uplifting lives, creating opportunities, and strengthening our commitment to the wellbeing of families in this community.” he said.He disclosed that since inception, the initiative has distributed more than 150,000 food packs across Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones, positively impacting hundreds of communities nationwide. “Today’s outreach has provided over 1,500 beneficiaries with essential feeding supplies that will help address hunger, support healthy living, and improve the overall wellbeing of families. This initiative also aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 2, which focuses on achieving Zero Hunger,” he added.Edekobi further commended the Personal Assistant to the President on Constituency Affairs, Hon. Khadijat Kareem Omotayo for supporting the initiative and fostering impactful partnerships that benefit underserved communities.Also speaking at the event, Hon. Khadijat Kareem Omotayo praised Fidelity Bank and the SAO Foundation for bringing meaningful support to residents of Surulere.“I am very happy that the foundation is growing. Fidelity Bank are our people and I appreciate this collaboration that has brought this massive opportunity to our people in Surulere Constituency 1,” she stated.She expressed optimism about sustaining future partnerships with the Bank to continue improving the lives and livelihoods of Nigerians.It would be recalled that the bank was recently recognized as the CSR Champion of the year at the 2025 Independent Newspaper Awards for its Food Bank initiative. The outreach to Surulere continues a legacy of impact, attracting community leaders, residents, and food bank partners, many of whom described the intervention as a timely boost amid prevailing economic challenges.Ranked among the best banks in Nigeria, Fidelity Bank Plc is a full-fledged Commercial Deposit Money Bank serving over 10 million customers through digital banking channels, its 255 business offices in Nigeria and United Kingdom subsidiary, FidBank UK Limited.The Bank is a recipient of multiple local and international Awards, including the 2024 Excellence in Digital Transformation & MSME Banking Award by BusinessDay Banks and Financial Institutions (BAFI) Awards; the 2024 Most Innovative Mobile Banking Application award for its Fidelity Mobile App by Global Business Outlook, and the 2024 Most Innovative Investment Banking Service Provider award by Global Brands Magazine. Additionally, the Bank was recognized as the Best Bank for SMEs in Nigeria by the Euromoney Awards for Excellence and as the Export Financing Bank of the Year by the BusinessDay Banks and Financial Institutions (BAFI) Awards.

Continue Reading

Banking and Finance

Sterling Financial Holdings Sustains Growth Momentum as Assets Cross ₦4 Trillion Mark in Q1, 2026

Published

on

By

…Group Profit rises 89% in FY2025, 53% in Q1 2026

Sterling Financial Holdings Company Plc (“Sterling Financial” or “theGroup”) has announced its audited financial results for the year ended December 31,2025, alongside its unaudited results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026,delivering strong earnings growth, balance sheet expansion, and improved capitalstrength across the Group.According to statement by Group CFO, Sterling Financial Holdings Company PLC, Adebimpe Olambiwonnu, Gross Earnings for FY2025 increased by 44.4% to ₦486.8 billion, representing the strongest performance in the Group’s modern history. Profit Before Tax rose by 89.2% to ₦86.8 billion, while Profit After Tax increased by 74.8% to ₦76.3 billion.The Group’s balance sheet also strengthened significantly during the year. Total Assets reached ₦3.91 trillion, Customer Deposits grew to ₦2.98 trillion, and Loans and Advances closed at ₦1.41 trillion while Shareholders’ Funds expanded by 40.5% to ₦428.7 billion.Sterling Financial sustained this momentum into the first quarter of 2026, with TotalAssets crossing the ₦4 trillion threshold for the first time, reaching ₦4.07 trillion.Gross Earnings for Q1 2026 rose by 41.6% year-on-year to ₦134.8 billion, supported bya 36.8% increase in Net Interest Income to ₦64.9 billion.Operating income reached ₦93.4 billion during the quarter, while Profit Before Taxincreased by 52.8% to ₦27.9 billion and Profit After Tax rose to ₦23.4 billion.Shareholders’ Funds strengthened further to ₦542.5 billion following the successfulcompletion of the Group’s recapitalisation programme.Commenting on the Group’s performance, Yemi Odubiyi, Group Managing Directorof Sterling Financial Holdings Company Plc, said: “Our FY2025 and Q1 2026 results reflect continued growth across the Group’s core businesses, supported by disciplined execution, improved operating efficiency, and a strengthened capital position.The successful completion of our recapitalisation programme positions the Group for the next phase of growth across our commercial banking, non-interest banking, and wealth-management businesses. We remain focused on sustaining growth, strengthening our balance sheet and delivering long-term value across our diversified platform.”This period represents an important phase in Sterling Financial’s evolution, as thecontinued growth of Sterling Bank and The Alternative Bank, alongside the expansionof SterlingFI Wealth Management, positioned the Group to compete across multiple segments under a unified Group structure and shared strategic agenda.The Group enters the rest of 2026 with stronger capital, expanded operating capacity and continued momentum across its banking and wealth-management businesses.ABOUT STERLING FINANCIAL HOLDINGS COMPANYSterling Financial Holdings Company PLC (Sterling Financial) is a leading Nigerian financial services group committed to enriching lives through innovation and impact. It’s diversified portfolio includes Sterling Bank Limited, The Alternative Bank Limited and SterlingFI WealthManagement among other businesses.As a holding company, Sterling provides strategic direction, governance, and sharedcapabilities across its subsidiaries, enabling each to focus on its core mandate while benefiting from group-wide expertise, technology, and oversight.With a heritage of trust built over six decades, Sterling Financial is committed to financial innovation, advancing inclusion, and shaping sustainable growth in Nigeria’s economy. The group continues to champion customer-focused solutions and socially responsible initiatives while creating long-term value for shareholders, employees and the communities it serves.

Continue Reading

Trending

Mega Awareness 2023