Connect with us

Litigation

Court Declares UBA’s Dismissal Wrongful, Orders Compensation

Published

on

Hon. Justice Anthony Ubaka of the Lagos judicial Division of the National Industrial Court has declared the purported summary dismissal of one Mabel from the service of United Bank for Africa as wrongful.

Justice Ubaka stated that the evidence before the court established that mabel was not given a fair hearing, and once there is a breach of fair hearing, are null and void.

Justice Ubaka stated that the action of United Bank for Africa is akin to producing a result before writing an examination and ordered the UBAto pay Mabel one (1) month’s salary in lieu of notice, with the sum of #200,000 as cost of action within 30 days.

From facts, the claimant- Mabel had contended that the entire investigative report and the disciplinary committee report on her purported dismissal were all based on speculation, false assumptions, and outright conjectures as the UBA failed to make police investigative report available before the honourable court in determining whether due process and fair hearing were observed.

Counsel to Mabel submitted that the summary dismissal of his client was not done in line with an established policy or procedure contained in the United Bank for Africa’s Staff Handbook and this being so, the purported disciplinary committee recommendations were devoid of any semblance of fairness and has caused incalculable harm and damage to her image and reputation.

In defence, the defendant- United Bank for Africa averred that Mabel was dismissed from the services of the Bank for Gross Misconduct in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract of employment between the Bank and Mabel and that the dismissal is neither unlawful nor wrongful.

In opposition, Mabel’s counsel, E.I Alosiba with E.O Okpoma maintained that all that the panel and disciplinary committee succeeded in doing was to cower and intimidate Mabel to submission, without affording her the opportunity to explain herself and state her case in an environment devoid of fear and intimidation; that their client was never offered a comprehensive reason for her dismissal, and urged the court to grant the reliefs sought.

Delivering judgment after careful evaluation of the submission of both parties, the presiding judge, Justice Anthony Ubaka held that where there is allegation of misconduct the employer has a duty to show that the dismissal was lawful, and the report where the UBA contended that Mabel was invited to the disciplinary committee and she voluntarily honoured the invitation and begged the disciplinary committee to temper justice with mercy is not before the court.

The Court stated that the evidence before the Court established that the United Bank for Africa set up a team and Mabel was not given the opportunity to state her own side.

Justice Ubaka stated that the action of UBA is akin to producing a result before writing an examination on the ground that the summary hearing by the disciplinary committee focused on the role each staff played but did not issue a query to hear their side of the story, and no query was issued and the response could have formed the basis for the UBA to rely on and find the fact of misconduct levelled against Mabel justified.

The Court agreed with the learned counsel that Mabel was not given the opportunity to defend herself before she was summarily dismissed as Mabel stated that she did her job diligently during her employment with the bank.

Justice Ubaka held that there is no way the dismissal of Mabel can be lawful without recourse to the principle that a query has to be issued and a response received before reaching a justice conclusion.

(S) The Nigeria Lawyer

Litigation

Court Slams Zenith Bank with N30m Damages over Fraudulent Debits in Customer’s Account

Published

on

Justice Alexander Owoeye of the Federal High Court in Lagos has ordered Zenith Bank Plc to pay Christomax Concept Limited the sum of N30 million as general and aggravated damages for fraudulently and illegally debiting the firm’s accounts.

The plaintiffs—Christomax Concept Limited, Chris Integrated Company Limited, and Mr. Christopher Adayi—filed suit number FHC/L/CS/2039/2024 through their lawyer, Adetunji Adedoyin-Adeniyi of AAA Chambers, seeking a declaration that the bank’s failure to refund the fraudulently deducted sum constituted a breach of fiduciary duty.

They also requested an order compelling Zenith Bank to immediately refund the N10.6 million.

They further sought:

An order for the bank to write off the balance of a loan granted to the 1st plaintiff on May 27, 2022, since the illegal deductions were not refunded.

An injunction restraining Zenith Bank from taking any action to recover the loan or from harassing or intimidating the plaintiffs.

A directive for the bank to pay N500 million in damages for breach of fiduciary duty.

However, Zenith Bank, in its defense, argued that the suit was wrongly filed as an Originating Summons instead of a Writ of Summons and should be struck out.

The bank contended that the N15 million allegedly deducted was partially recovered, with N5,068,290.00 salvaged from Kuda Microfinance Bank.

The bank further argued that declaratory reliefs could not be granted without solid evidence and urged the court to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims.

Justice Owoeye, in his judgment, pointed out that Zenith Bank had admitted to issuing a debit card linked to the plaintiffs’ accounts.

He stated that as the card issuer, the bank was responsible for authorizing transactions made with the card, taking action in case of fraud to stop further unauthorized use, and reversing fraudulent transactions when advised or directed.

The judge criticized the bank for failing to act after the fraud was reported on July 13, 2022, describing its conduct as “oppressive and high-handed.”

The court also ruled that the bank’s failure to refund N10,631,710.00, which was fraudulently deducted from the plaintiffs’ accounts, resulted in loss of business and goodwill, amounting to a breach of fiduciary duty owed by the bank.

The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and ordered:

An immediate refund of N10,631,710.00 deducted from their accounts.

A payment of N30 million in damages for breach of fiduciary duty, loss of business, goodwill, embarrassment, inconvenience, and hardship caused to the plaintiffs.

This judgment reaffirms banks’ duty to protect customers’ funds and take swift action in fraud cases.

Continue Reading

Litigation

Abia Businessman Sues First Bank over Alleged N55m Fixed Deposit Fraud

Published

on

By

An Abia businessman, Eke Agbai Eke, has sued First Bank of Nigeria over an alleged fraudulent withdrawal of N55 million from his fixed deposit account at the bank’s former Abiriba branch, now relocated to Uzuakoli.

In his lawsuit, filed by his lawyer,Ebuka Nwaeze, the claimant stated that First Bank has refused to return his deposit, which he originally placed at the Abiriba branch to help sustain the bank’s presence in his community.

The claimant stated that as a community leader, he viewed the deposit as a contribution to local development.

The alleged fraud came to light in December 2023 when Eke discovered he could no longer access his personal account through the bank’s mobile app and was unable to reach the Business Development Manager. Upon visiting First Bank’s Gwarinpa branch in Abuja, he was reportedly informed that N55 million had been withdrawn from his fixed deposit in six consecutive transactions—even though he was in Umuahia at the time of the unauthorized deductions.

Following this discovery, Eke demanded the liquidation of his fixed deposit, but months passed without any action from the bank.

After multiple complaints, First Bank launched an internal investigation, which resulted in the dismissal of fewer than nine senior officials allegedly linked to the fraud.While First Bank’s legal counsel declined to comment, the plaintiff’s lawyers have publicly addressed the matter.

Continue Reading

Litigation

Court Orders Final Forfeiture of $1.4m Linked to Emefiele, Ex-CBN Gov

Published

on

By

Justice Ayokunle Faji of the Federal High Court, Ikoyi, Lagos, on Thursday, March 6, 2025, ordered the final forfeiture of $1,426,175.14 ( One Million, Four Hundred and Twenty Six Thousand, One Hundred and Seventy Five United States Dollars, Fourteen cents)  linked to a former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, Godwin Emefiele.

The order followed a motion filed by the respondent seeking to set aside the court’s final forfeiture order of June 25, 2024.

The court had given the final forfeiture order after a motion on notice filed and argued by Bilkisu Buhari, counsel for the EFCC, which went uncontested by any interested parties.

The motion was supported by an affidavit deposed to by David Jayeoba, an investigating officer with the EFCC who stated that investigation carried out showed that the fund was reasonably suspected to be proceed of unlawful activities “warehoused” in Donatone Limited’s  (DL)’s Titan Trust Bank account.He stated thus: “The investigation traced the funds to having been fixed into interest-yielding accounts, dissipated and laundered through a foreign account in Mauritius, and transported back to Nigeria under disguise.“Of the total sum of $26,552,000.00 USD received by the firm, the balance standing in the said account as of today is the sum of $1,426,175.14 million USD.

It is the balance in the account that the applicant seeks to forfeit to the Federal Government of Nigeria, which has been traced to be the proceeds of unlawful activities of erstwhile Central Bank Governor of Nigeria, Mr. Godwin Emefiele and his cronies.“Investigation further revealed that the international entities sourcing for forex were pressured into parting with huge funds to access forex during the period.“The signatories to the account warehousing the sum of $1,426,175.14 USD sought to be forfeited are at large and are making frantic efforts to dissipate the funds electronically.”Subsequently, the court granted the order.

However, in a counter-affidavit by solicitors for Donatone Limited dated November 25, 2024, they argued that the depositions contained in paragraphs four to 18 of the affidavit deposed to by Jayeoba were not correct.Responding to the counter-affidavit, the EFCC in an affidavit dated November 29, 2024 countered their claim with more evidence.Subsequently, Justice Faji held that: “Anyone laying claims to the fund, must show the lawfulness of the acquisition and not that the said fund is not proceeds of crime.“Having listened to the submission of the applicant’s counsel and also perused the motion just moved, together with the affidavit in support, the motion is hereby granted.”

Consequently, Justice Faji granted the application for final forfeiture of the fund.

Continue Reading

Trending

Mega Awareness 2023