Foreign
Sudanese gov’t signs long-awaited peace deal with armed groups
Sudan’s transitional government signs much-anticipated peace deal with various armed groups, raising hopes of an end to 17 years of conflict.

Actors in Sudan crisis makes peace
Sudan’s transitional government on Monday signed a much-anticipated peace deal with various armed groups, raising hopes of an end to 17 years of conflict.
Prime Minister Abdullah Hamdok and Transitional Sovereignty Council Chairman Abdel Fattah al-Burhan signed the agreement with the Sudan Revolutionary Front, a coalition of armed groups operating mainly in the volatile Darfur, Blue Nile, and South Kordofan regions, the country’s national broadcaster reported.
After nine months of tough negotiations, the signing took place in Juba, the capital of neighbouring South Sudan, under the auspices of President Salva Kiir, who has been instrumental in mediating the deal.
The landmark pact includes agreements regarding power sharing, land ownership, compensation, reconciliation as well as the return of those displaced from their homes during 17 years of conflict.
It also foresees the dismantling of rebel forces and their integration into the national army.
One armed group, the SPLM-North led by Abdulaziz Al-Hilu, withdrew from the negotiations, claiming Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) had recently attacked its supporters.
Armed groups have been the cause of ongoing violence in the volatile nation on the Horn of Africa since 2003, when unrest erupted in the restive Darfur region.
Some 300,000 people have been killed due to the conflict and millions have been displaced, according to the United Nations.
Foreign
U.S., Iran sign peace agreement to end four-month war
The United States (U.S) and Iran have formally agreed to end their four-month armed conflict through a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) brokered with the support of Pakistan.
The breakthrough was announced by Shehbaz Shari, Pakistan’s Prime Minister, who said the agreement—referred to as the “Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding”—was signed electronically by the leadership of both countries and endorsed through his mediation role.
Under the terms of the initial framework, Iran is expected to immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil shipping route, while the United States will lift its naval blockade on Iranian ports as part of early de-escalation measures.
The agreement was reportedly finalized after signatures were exchanged digitally between the parties, following engagements involving U.S. President Donald Trump and Iranian officials.
A major component of the deal includes the establishment of a $300 billion support fund for Iran, alongside the release of frozen assets and easing of sanctions.
However, more complex issues—particularly Iran’s nuclear programme, enriched uranium stockpiles, and regional security concerns—were not resolved in the initial agreement and have been pushed to a structured 60-day technical negotiation phase.
Further discussions will focus on verification mechanisms, nuclear oversight, and broader security guarantees, with Pakistan and Qatar continuing their mediation roles.
Prime Minister Sharif described the development as a significant diplomatic breakthrough and credited multiple regional and international actors for supporting the peace process.
The conflict, which began in late February following coordinated military strikes, had continued intermittently despite a ceasefire attempt earlier in April before the latest agreement brought formal closure to active hostilities.
Further discussions will focus on verification mechanisms, nuclear oversight, and broader security guarantees, with Pakistan and Qatar continuing their mediation roles.
Prime Minister Sharif described the development as a significant diplomatic breakthrough and credited multiple regional and international actors for supporting the peace process.
The conflict, which began in late February following coordinated military strikes, had continued intermittently despite a ceasefire attempt earlier in April before the latest agreement brought formal closure to active hostilities.
Foreign
Ethiopian PM pledges more air strikes in Tigray

Ethiopian jets bombed the Tigray region and Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed pledged more air strikes in the escalating conflict amid reports that Tigrayan forces had seized control of federal military sites and weapons.
Civilians in the northern region should avoid “collateral damage” by not gathering outside as strikes would continue, Abiy said defying international pleas for both sides to show restraint.
The developments illustrate how quickly the days-old conflict is escalating, raising the threat of a civil war that experts and diplomats warn would destabilise the country of 110 million people and hurt the broader Horn of Africa.
A simmering row between Abiy’s federal government and his former Tigrayan allies exploded on Wednesday after Abiy ordered a military campaign. Abiy, who won last year’s Nobel Peace Prize, accused the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), of attacking a federal military base and trying to steal equipment. He said “the last red line” had been crossed.
In a step to further deny legitimacy to Tigray’s regional government elected in September against the federal government’s advise, Ethiopia’s federal parliament on Saturday approved the formation of an interim government for the region.
“A decision has been passed to remove the current executive body and council of (Tigray) region,” Ethiopia’s House of Federation said in a statement on its Facebook page.
The government cut phone and internet communications to the region, according to the digital rights group Access Now, making it impossible to verify official accounts. The government accused the TPLF of shutting down communications.
Diplomats, regional security officers and aid workers said that fighting is spreading in the northwestern part of the country, along Tigray’s border with the Amhara region, which is backing the federal government, and near the border with Sudan and Eritrea.
Abiy said on Friday that government troops had seized control of the town of Dansha, near the border area, from the TPLF.
Risks
After toppling a Marxist dictator in 1991, the TPLF led the country’s multi-ethnic ruling coalition until Abiy took office in 2018. For those decades, Tigrayans dominated the military.
Abiy, who is from the Oromo ethnic group, Ethiopia’s largest, has sacked many senior generals as part of a crackdown on past rights abuses and corruption which Tigrayans complain unfairly targets them.
Tigrayan forces are battle-hardened and possess significant stocks of military hardware, experts say. Their regional troops and associated militias number up to 250,000 men, according to the International Crisis Group think tank.
One of the biggest risks is that the Ethiopian army will splinter along ethnic lines, with Tigrayans defecting to the regional force. There are indications that is already happening, reports said.
Tigrayan forces were in control of the federal military’s Northern Command headquarters in the city of Mekelle, according to a United Nations internal security report.
The Northern Command is one of Ethiopia’s four military commands and controls the border with Sudan, Djibouti and Eritrea.
Tigrayan forces have seized “heavy weapons” from several of the command’s depots, the report read.
It said that the command is the most heavily armed and contains “most of the military’s heavy weapons including the majority of the country’s mechanised and armoured units, artillery and air assets.”
The government is mobilising troops from around the country and sending them to Tigray, risking a security vacuum in other parts of the country where ethnic violence is raging.
More than 50 people were killed by gunmen from a rival ethnic group in western Ethiopia recently, reports said.
Troop redeployments from near the border with Somalia will make that area “more vulnerable to possible incursions by Al Shabaab,” the al Qaeda-linked insurgency trying to overthrow the government in Somalia, according to the U.N. internal security report.
Foreign
Trump nominee elected to head Latin American development bank

U.S. President Donald Trump’s nominee was, on Saturday, elected president of the Inter-American Development Bank, the region’s main economic development lender, making him the first U.S. citizen to lead the institution in its 61-year history.
Mauricio Claver-Carone, Trump’s senior Latin America adviser, told the bank’s governors before voting began that he would be “a passionate advocate” for the bank, its staff and the region.
He will take office on Oct. 1 and has pledged to serve only one five-year term.
Trump’s decision to nominate a U.S. candidate to head the bank broke with a tradition for the president to come from the region and sparked criticism from some Latin American countries, development groups and the European Union.
But Claver-Carone won the backing of a majority of countries in the region.
Thirty of the Bank’s 48 governors voted for Claver-Carone, including 23 from the region, amounting to 66.8 per cent of the vote, a spokesman for the U.S. National Security Council said.
A source familiar with the vote said 16 countries abstained.
Argentina, Mexico, Chile and Costa Rica – concerned about the longer-term precedent of the move – initially sought to delay the vote but failed to win sufficient backing to do so.
The IDB vote turned into a geopolitical battle between the Trump administration, which is keen to gain leverage in resource-rich Latin America and counter the rise of China, and some in the region who wanted to retain control of the top job.
Some countries also were concerned about Claver-Carone, a Trump loyalist, if Trump loses the Nov. 3 presidential election to Democrat Joe Biden, whose campaign also criticised the nomination of the Cuba hawk.
Claver-Carone said he would work with member countries to “strengthen the bank, respond to the needs of the region and create opportunities for shared prosperity and economic growth’’.
The IDB has been led by Latin Americans, with an American in the No. 2 job, since the institution’s inception in 1959.
Critics say electing Claver-Carone to head the bank and his pledge to appoint a Latin American as executive vice president sets a precedent that could harm Washington in the end by loosening its hold on the bank’s No. 2 post.
Senator Patrick Leahy, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, said the vote raised questions about Latin Americans “charting their own future” and signalled it could have consequences for U.S. funding of the institution.
“I have always believed that to be successful, countries need to take responsibility for their own development, and the U.S. should play a supportive role.
“Those roles have now been reversed and we need to review whether this is the best use of resources to assist the people of those countries,’’ Leahy said in a statement to Reuters.
Source: Reuters
-
Business and Brand1 day agoTomTom Continues to Back the Music Talents through its Youth Focus Initiatives
-
Business and Brand1 day agoMILO Recovers over 1 Million Wrappers Through Elevate Recycling Initiative
-
Business1 day agoShareholders back Access Holdings’ long-term value creation strategy-Investors confident of earnings outlook
-
NEWS1 day agoBreaking Barriers, Building Legacies: Fiona Ahmed Ahimie Launches LEADHER Mentorship Session to Inspire the Next Generation of Female leaders
-
Aviation1 day agoQatar Airways Strengthens Leadership for Next Phase of Growth
-
Entertainment4 hours agoEntertainment Non-Stop: Movies and Shows to Watch on GOtv This Week
-
Banking and Finance3 hours agoFidelity Bank Empowers Exporters to Unlock AfCFTA Opportunities with EMP 19
